<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="0.92">
<channel>
	<title>KnowEvolution</title>
	<link>http://knowevolution.com</link>
	<description>But if we could conceive in some warm little pond...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 03:26:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss092</docs>
	<language>en</language>
	<!-- generator="WordPress/3.2.1" -->

	<item>
		<title>Is ID An Argument From Ignorance?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Follow this post by Barry Arrington and its lively discussion at Uncommon Descent: http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/18663/]]></description>
		<link>http://knowevolution.com/2011/04/12/is-id-an-argument-from-ignorance/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Access Research Network Posts Top 10 Darwin and Design News Stories of 2009</title>
		<description><![CDATA[The Access Research Network is an excellent free online resource, and they also publish a Top 10 press release list as well as a Resources List. Link:   http://arn.org/top10/2009newsstories.pdf You can see an archive back to 2006 here:  http://arn.org/top10/]]></description>
		<link>http://knowevolution.com/2010/01/19/access-research-network-posts-top-10-darwin-and-design-news-stories-of-2009/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Hugh Hewitt Interviews Richard Dawkins (Transcript)</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Talk Radio host Hugh Hewitt talks to Richard Dawkins about the state of the Evolution debate and Dawkins&#8217; newest book &#8220;The Greatest Show On Earth.&#8221;  The interview is quite an interesting one, and the transcript will give the reader an opportunity to examine what is real factual detail, and what is simply hand-waving claims. What may be even more telling is the reaction from supporters of Dawkins found HERE at his website where the transcript is also provided. I do hope that Dawkins will take Hewitt up on another round in the near future. Link HERE]]></description>
		<link>http://knowevolution.com/2009/10/24/hugh-hewitt-interviews-richard-dawkins-transcript/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Can Creationists Make Accurate Predictions About Evolution?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Learning about evolution also means learning about the participants in the ongoing discussion.  Some would have us believe that only a biologist,  or maybe a paleontologist with a PhD is capable of discussing and fully understanding the concept of evolution.  Others will tell us that there is really no dissent among scientists about how evolution happened.  You should not be swayed by these arguments.  Smart, critically thinking minds are everywhere, and sometimes it takes a sharp mind coming from a completely different perspective to see the strengths and weaknesses in an idea. Creationists probably take the biggest beating of all among the participants in<a href="http://knowevolution.com/2009/06/15/can-creationists-make-accurate-predictions-about-evolution/">&#160;&#160;[ Read More ]</a>]]></description>
		<link>http://knowevolution.com/2009/06/15/can-creationists-make-accurate-predictions-about-evolution/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Michael Ruse Debates Stephen Meyer on ID</title>
		<description><![CDATA[via Faith&#38;Evolution on ThinkTank with Ben Wattenberg http://www.thinktanktv.com/media/index.php?a=watch#video_place_holder]]></description>
		<link>http://knowevolution.com/2009/06/06/michael-ruse-debates-stephen-meyer-on-id/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Cross-Examination in Texas (This is a must-hear resource)</title>
		<description><![CDATA[This podcast provided by ID The Future provides audio of the testimony provided by Dr Stephen Meyer during the recent hearings at the Texas State Board of Education. This is a great audio resource, and it should put to rest many of the half-truths and disinformation being spread by dogmatic methodological materialists about groups such as the Discovery Institute and authors such as Michael Behe.]]></description>
		<link>http://knowevolution.com/2009/03/22/cross-examination-in-texas-this-is-a-must-hear-resource/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Theories With No Weaknesses</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Evolution News &#38; Views is doing a nice job of keeping in step with the debate raging in Texas right now.  Eugenie Scott and friends are busy with their typical defense of Darwinism which includes the time-tested tactic of &#8230;.strawman.  Eugenie seems very smug and comfortable as she unabashedly defends &#8220;fudging&#8221; science drawings, so it should come as no surprise that she can offer this type of defense. But it appears there is a bright spot to come of all of this because Eugenie has now invited critics to come to universities and speak about these supposed weaknesses.  I am<a href="http://knowevolution.com/2009/01/22/theories-with-no-weaknesses/">&#160;&#160;[ Read More ]</a>]]></description>
		<link>http://knowevolution.com/2009/01/22/theories-with-no-weaknesses/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Irreducibly Complex Carnivorous Plants?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#8217;t remember the last time I saw Carnivorous plants featured in mainstream science articles.  This fascinating paper by a pair of scientists at the Max-Planck-Institute for Plant Breeding Research in Cologne, Germany provides detailed analysis that has significant implications for the current Darwinian paradigm. Carnivorous plants constitute a fascinating group of mostly independently arisen organisms. Their true nature was unrecognized for centuries by most botanists and other researchers, and they still present many open scientific questions conc erning habitats, functional morphology, systematics and especially the origin of species. Download the pdf paper HERE]]></description>
		<link>http://knowevolution.com/2008/07/29/irreducibly-complex-carnivorous-plants/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Altenberg 16: An Exposé Of The Evolution Industry – by Suzan Mazur</title>
		<description><![CDATA[This is probably one of the very first intellectually honest approaches to a critique of Darwinism that I have seen in a very long time.  The Altenberg 16, as they are known are a true anomaly when it comes to anyone approaching the Darwinian camp with serious questions.  Suzan is no &#8220;newby&#8221; to journalism, nor to the subject matter, yet this is a fascinating read as she talks to the 16 distinguished scientists and philosophers and attempts to pitch her work to mainstream media.  Questions we just don&#8217;t get to see in media &#8211; at all. Will she be run out on<a href="http://knowevolution.com/2008/07/24/altenberg-16-an-expose-of-the-evolution-industry-by-suzan-mazur/">&#160;&#160;[ Read More ]</a>]]></description>
		<link>http://knowevolution.com/2008/07/24/altenberg-16-an-expose-of-the-evolution-industry-by-suzan-mazur/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Definitions &#8211; Microbiologist Ralph Seelke talks about Micro and Macro evolution</title>
		<description><![CDATA[This link via ID The Future This ties in nicely with my last posts which talk a little bit about how important it is to define terms when having a debate or exchange between a naturalist thinker and a theistic one regarding evolution.  Seelke talks in clear terms about both the micro and the macro of things, and uses some great examples to illustrate. This can be listened to online or as a podcast.  I encourage you to check it out and listen in on your next commute!]]></description>
		<link>http://knowevolution.com/2008/01/04/definitions-microbiologist-ralph-seelke-talks-about-micro-and-macro-evolution/</link>
			</item>
</channel>
</rss>

